How did we get here

A concise but informative look over history on how we the people of the Commonwealth of Australia were deceived into slavery. You have to understand the history to comprehend the present and where things are going.

Before Christ, Nimrod

Nimrod & Catholic Paganism

Satan’s church had its beginning at Babylon with the construction of the Tower of Babel on the plain of Shinar by the River Euphrates many generations after the deluge. At the time of the construction of Babylon at the Tower of Babel, mankind had multiplied and spoken one language. Cush who was the son of Ham and grandson of Noah, helped to plan with his son Nimrod, a blueprint by which to rule the world (One World Government) of humanity through a wicked counterfeit religion. Nimrod was the originator of sun worship and founder of Babylon.

When the cold season began every year, they believed their sun god was leaving them. It was on December 25th that they noticed the gradual return of the sun god. So they called this day the birth of the sun. Tammuz was hailed as the son of the sun. He was idolized and even worshipped and the first letter of his name became the symbol of sun worship. Human sacrifices to the sun god were offered on this initial letter made of wood, known as the cross ‘T’ and this ‘T’ for Tammuz is also the true origin of Catholics crossing themselves. His birthday of December 25 was honoured more and more. Satan worked many years before the conception and birth of the true Messiah to counterfeit through sun worship His miraculous conception and birth. Satan succeeded many times in leading YHWH’s people into sin and pagan sun worship.

The true date of the birth of Yeshua is most likely between July and September but since the exact date of Yeshua's birthday was unknown. This was the time when the sun had reached its lowest point on the horizon and started back up into the heavens and so the sun god had come to life, so to speak. So gradually December 25th came to be known as the birthday of Yeshua. The Papal Church (Roman Cult) finally instituted a special mass on that day, ‘Christ's Mass,’ and so December 25th became ‘Christmas.’ The yule log burning in the fire followed by the green tree lit with candles all came from the pagan worship representing Nimrod being dead, while his spirit still lived on in the sun and was alive again in Tammuz his son.

Yeshua was crucified and resurrected in the spring of the year near the time of the moon festival. Satan’s minions were at work once again to bring the idea of having a celebration at the same time as the heathen but calling it ‘in honour of the resurrection.’ And in regards to the worship of the moon goddess Semiramis, the so called Queen of Heaven. The cakes to the Queen of Heaven were round and on them was cut a cross in honour of the sun god, and they were offered to the Queen of Heaven and today we call them “hot cross buns.” (Read Jeremiah 7:16-18). The forty days of ‘weeping for Tammuz’ became Lent and at the close of Lent came Easter Sunday.

Nimrod & Catholic Paganism

The Line of Authority

Jacob & the 12 Tribes of Israel

The name Israel (Yisra'el) is commonly translated as ‘Wrestled with God’, but it can also mean ‘Champion (or Prince) of God’, ‘Striver with (or against) God’, ‘Ruler (or Prince) over God’, ‘God Prevails’, ‘God Rules’, ‘God will Rule’, or possibly ‘God Who Will Rule’. There are two quite different traditions in Genesis that set out to explain the reason for this change of name.

The first, and most obviously suited to the etymology, is in Genesis chapter 32. Jacob wrestled all night with a stranger, until it was time for the sun to come up and it was time for the stranger to leave. Jacob refused to let the stranger leave unless he blessed Jacob. The stranger told Jacob that henceforth his name would no longer be Jacob, but instead be Israel, for he had wrestled with God. YHWH established his covenant with Jacob's grandfather, Abraham.

The blessings continued through Jacob's father, Isaac, then to Jacob and his descendants. Jacob's descendants (seed) became the 12 tribes of Israel. YHWH promised that Abraham will be the father of many nations, and kings shall come from him, once again following the original covenant of the dual promise of Birthright and Sceptre.

The Divine Right of Kings or Divine Right is a political and religious doctrine of royal and political legitimacy. It asserts that a monarch is subject to no earthly authority, deriving the right to rule directly from the will of God. The king is thus not subject to the will of his people, the aristocracy, or any other estate of the realm, including (especially in Protestant countries) the Catholic Church.

The idea of divinely-ordained monarchy is backed up by scripture. After an unsuccessful attempt to rule His chosen people (The Israelites) directly through a council of judges, YHWH finally gave in to the demand of the people for a King to rule over them. The Israelites did not have a ‘King’.

YHWH had originally choose Saul, however he was too disobedient. So YHWH choose another, young David (The slayer of Goliath, the Giant/Nephilim), David was a descendent of the patriarch Judah. This is the line of the British Royal Family.

Jacob & the 12 Tribes of Israel

6th Century CE - Justinian System

Emperor Justinian - Birth of the Roman Civil Law System

Roman law is the legal system of ancient Rome, including Roman Military Jurisdiction and the legal developments spanning over a thousand years of jurisprudence, from the 12 Tablets (c. 449 BCE), to the Corpus Juris Civilis (CE 529). The historical importance of Roman law is reflected by the continued use of Latin legal terminology in legal systems influenced by it.

In 538 CE Emperor Justinian decreed that the Roman Church now ruled the world. Henceforth, its reign would be known as the ‘Holy Roman Empire’. It is important to note that pagan popes can be traced back to Babylon but no Christian popes existed until Constantine in 312 CE declaring himself to be Pope.

Civil law: the system of law that emerged in continental Europe beginning in the Middle Ages and is based on codified law drawn from national legislation and ancient Roman law. The term civil law derives from the Latin ius civile, the law applicable to all Roman citizens (do you consider yourself a Roman Citizen? A member of the [Un]-Holy Roman Empire?).

Its origins and model are to be found in the monumental compilation of Roman law commissioned by the Emperor. Justinian in the sixth century CE, Equity/Chancery and Admiralty/Maritime courts applied Roman/Babylonian law.

Emperor Justinian - Birth of the Roman Civil Law System

746 A.D. Khazarian Jews

Majority of Jews are not actually of Jewish decent

90% of present-day Jews are Khazars by origin. They are a Turkish-Mongol tribe, which was converted to Judaism in the middle of the 8th century. When their empire fell apart in 10th century they settled down across Russia and Europe, and later on the American continent as well. They are converts and have no Semitic origins at all. The Semite Jews come from Palestine and number between 7 and 10%.

These modern Pharisees merely proclaim they are ‘Jews’ out of a strategy to affect their ancient plunder oriented slave trading purpose. Approximately 90% of them are not even of the ‘Semitic’ bloodline, but rather are of the Ashkenazi/Khazar race/Bloodline.

The Pharisees are likened to the modern Freemasons, whose gnostic and dominions agenda were subversive of society. The Pharisees are the modern

Zionists, i.e. the Judeo-Freemasons, who are secret practitioners of the Kabalah,with the facade of holding to the traditional beliefs of Israelites as set forth in the Old Testament.

Majority of Jews are not actually of Jewish decent

1066, Norman Conquest

The Corruption of English Common Law with Cannon Law

The Jews worked with the Normans under the ‘Blessing of the Pope’ of Rome. The Roman Civil/Municipal/Military Codes were forcibly imposed over the Non-Romanised Christian/Common Law people of England.

Note: Normans were part of the [Un]-Holy Roman Empire.

Tore at the Fabric:

It seems that the aggressively warring nature of that Babylonian Talmud based Code of Pharisaical Conduct is not in question. It seems to clearly be a body of Master Slave - Trading Codes, which are designed to ‘Tear at the Fabric’ of any Society which it targets.


The linkage between ‘Equity Jurisdiction’ and Romantic ‘Civil/Municipal/Military Law’, is shown in the following:

"The whole of equity jurisprudence prevailing in England & the United States is mainly based on the civil law".

 (Boviers Law Dictionary; 1868)

Civil Law is from Rome:

There was no ‘Equity Jurisprudence’ in England prior to the Norman Conquest. The Norman Conquest had the ‘solemn approval of the Pope’ of Rome.

"The Jews, whom the Normans brought to England ...brought a refined system of commercial law: their own form of commerce & a system of rules to facilitate and govern it.”

(The Shetar's Effect on English Law", The Georgetown Law Journal; V. 71, P 1179 -1200)

The obvious conclusion is thatthe Norman’s ‘War of Aggression’ was jointly backed by the Pharisees and the Pope of Rome, all so as to forcibly impose the Roman Civil/Municipal/Military Codes of Babylonian Talmud based on the Master – Slave relationship enforced by the military. These were mere tools for slave control which were early imposed by evil men with great influence within the Pharisaical and Roman Catholic religious’ communities and can only be seen as terrorism against the people of Britain.

All Conscience bound People will recognize that no true spirituality could possibly have been brought into England at that time. The ‘Forces of Evil’ were in full control during the so called ‘Norman Conquest’. Just like at the Crusades; and at the Inquisition. The religious forces consistently behind these movements have a very consistent evil track record.

Evil men aggressively made religious war against the Christian/Common Law – Anglo Saxon/Celtic peoples of England in 1066. The Babylonian Talmud was completed well before the Norman Conquest of 1066. It’s all the same basic Master/Slave commerce form of Code of Human Conduct. It all treats living/breathing people as ‘merchandise’ in commerce to be bought and sold as those "Slaves & the Souls of Men" as referred to in Revelation 18:13. This entire body of Codified Human Conduct is all so amorally lacking in fidelity to the supreme laws of ‘Love of Neighbour’ from YHWH, as taught by his son Yeshua; as to be clearly a policy of the “Synagogue of Satan” as referred to in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9.

1215, Magna Carta

The Magna Carta & It's Relevance in Modern Day.

The Magna Carta – “Great Charter” - is an 800-year-old document from Europe’s Middle Ages, yet surprisingly it is still relevant in common law today. 

Signed and sealed on the banks of the River Thames on 15 June 1215, the Magna forms the foundation of our rights. Originally a treaty between King John of England and rebel Barons, it’s a document which over many centuries has shaped the exercise of power, the rights of the people, and the role of the law.

Magna Carta is Central to Australia’s democratic foundations. From its beginning the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1901 has been based on the Magna Carta’s ideals of individual liberty and freedom, and the constraint of power. The Charter did not grant rights to anyone but simply recognized pre-existing natural liberties that the English had enjoyed long before the Normans conquered their island in 1066. Nevertheless, Magna Carta has been the basis of much of the body of law upholding our inherent rights and freedoms.

Not surprisingly, kings and popes continually tried to nullify and ignore Magna Carta because of its attempt to restrict their power and uphold the sovereignty of the people. Shortly after the Charter’s promulgation, Pope Innocent III issued a papal bull “annulling” it and threatening with excommunication King John and all those who’d signed it. The popes of the catholic church have always claimed that all people and their souls belong to their church. 

Regardless, even though the Great Charter was reissued several times over the centuries the original document is set in stone and cannot be changed. Ever since it was signed it has played a pivotal role in the rise of the English parliament and the Commons as a self-governing body.

Lawful Rebellion and How it Works

A committee of 25 Barons petitioned the Queen to invoke article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215 on March 23rd, 2001 in protest of the treasonous act of the then Prime Minister, Tony Blair in signing the Treaty of Nice, thus unlawfully causing the destruction of fundamental British liberties.

You can confirm this by researching the letters available on the internet between Robin Janvrin and the Committee of the Barons at the time Therefore, we have already informed the Crown that all members of the Commonwealth of Australia are able to lawfully rebel. This means that we must always remain lawful and loyal to the sovereign. It also means that we must take full responsibility for our actions according to our Oath, and to stand by Article 61 yourself.

You can do this by writing to “officials” who are acting unlawfully, corruptly, or treasonously to inform them that they have a 'duty of care' to protect and to serve the people, according to constitutional law, under a constitutional monarchy, which they have usurped by their criminal actions in public. 

By informing them that you are standing in honour and lawfully rebelling against their actions, you are warning them that they can be held accountable before a common law court.

The Magna Carta & It's Relevance in Modern Day.

1302, Unam Sanctum

Worlds First Express Trust Created

Unam Sanctam was the first of many Papal Bulls that made significant steps towards world domination by the Catholic Church. Issued by Pope Boniface VIII in 1302, it was the first Express Trust created claiming control over the whole planet and effectively ‘Ruler of the World’.

This 1st Crown is represented by the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust created when a child is born, depriving them of all their beneficial entitlements and rights on the land at birth. With Pope Boniface VIII saying:

“We declare, say, define, and pronounce, that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.”

(Source: Bull ‘Unam Sanctum,’ as cited in Apostolic Digest, Book V: The Book of Obedience)

Note: “every human creature” Gen1: 27 created by Elohim as male and female not as a living soul like Adam and Eve.

Worlds First Express Trust Created

1455, Romanus Pontifex

1st Testamentary Deed & Will & 1st Crown over Land

This first Crown is represented by the first Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born. It deprives us of all beneficial entitlements and rights on the land.  

Pope Boniface VIII was the first leader in history to create the concept of a Trust, but the first Testamentary Trust, through a deed and will creating a Deceased Estate, was created by Pope Nicholas V in 1455, through the Papal Bull Romanus Pontifex. This is only one of three (3) papal bulls to include the line with the incipit “For a perpetual remembrance.” 

This Bull had the effect of conveying the right of use of the land as Real Property, from the Express Trust Unam Sanctam, to the control of the Pontiff and his successors in perpetuity. Hence, all land is claimed as “crown land”. 

1st Testamentary Deed & Will & 1st Crown over Land

1481, Aeterni Regis

Crown of the Commonwealth (BODY) Crown 2.

The third Claim of Right and second Trust is created under Pope Sixtus IV, called Aeterni Regis, Regis of course meaning Crown and Aeterni meaning eternal, the Eternal Crown. This is the Third Crown making up the Unholy Trinity. This Crown removes your personal property rights and putting all people into permanent slavery.

This Papal Bull created what is known as the ‘Crown of Aragon’, later known as the ‘Crown of Spain’, being the highest sovereign and highest steward of all Roman slave’s subject to the rule of the Roman Pontiff.

This 2nd Crown is represented by the 2nd Cestui Que Vie Trust created when a child is born being the sale of the birth certificate as a Bond to the private central bank of the nation, depriving them of ownership of their flesh and condemning them to perpetual servitude as a Roman Person, or slave.

Spain lost the crown in 1604 when it was granted to King James I of England by Pope Paul V after the successful passage of the “Union of Crowns”, or Commonwealth, in 1605 after the false flag operation of the Gunpowder Plot. The Crown was finally lost by England in 1975, when it was returned to Spain and King Carlos I, where it remains to this day.

Crown of the Commonwealth (BODY) Crown 2.

1517, The Reformation & Protestantism

An Awakening to Catholic Paganism

Up until the reformation the [Un]-Holy Roman Empire was in full control of the Christian religion, the reformists left the Catholic Church believing that it and Their System were the anti-Christ. This is where protestant countries reestablished their authority and rejected the [Un]-Holy Roman Empires' supremacy, King Henry VIII initiated this in England.

With the arrival of the printing press in the 15th century and the resulting explosion of Bibles accessible in the common language from Protestant sources, it became readily apparent to those who could now study the prophecies of Daniel and Revelation in particular, that Bible prophecy identified by symbols a persecuting apostate entity generally known as antichrist.

The Antichrist was clearly not merely a single individual, it was a system of apostasy and persecution that would hold control for over twelve centuries. The inevitable conclusion of those who studied these prophecies in scripture, before and during the Protestant Reformation, was that there was only one entity that fit all these characteristics and perfectly: The Papal dynasty of the Roman Catholic Church, head of the [Un]-Holy Roman Empire and current World System.

Is it any wonder that the Catholic Church was so violently opposed to the scriptures being available for everyone to read for themselves?

There was such a stir created during the reformation that the fifth Lateran Council (1512-17 CE) resorted to strictly forbidding anyone to publish a book without prior censorship, and also prohibited anyone from preaching on the subject of antichrist. The Reformation preachers unanimously identified the papal system as the Antichrist, and the Roman Church as Babylon - causing a mass exodus of believers out of the Catholic institution.

Because Rome realized that the Reformation could jeopardize her position as a religio-political power, she employed five strategies in what became known as the ‘Counter Reformation’. One of those strategies was the creation of ‘Futurism and Preterism’, two different interpretations of the prophecies in Daniel and Revelations. These interpretations contradicted the reformers’ stance of historicism.

An Awakening to Catholic Paganism

1531 Convocation (Baptism)

3rd Testamentary Deed & Will & 3rd Crown over Souls.

A third Trust was created called Convocation and relates to Baptism and thus your soul. This relates directly to the Commonwealth or as making up the common-wealth owned by the Holy See from the ownership of the souls of the masses.


This third Crown is represented by the third Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is baptised. It is the parents’ grant of the Baptismal certificate––title to the soul––to the church or Registrar. Thus, without legal title over one’s own soul, we will be denied legal standing and will be treated as things––cargo without souls–– upon which the BAR (British Accreditation Registry) is now legally able to enforce Maritime law.  


The third Crown was created in 1537 by Paul III, through the papal bull Convocation, also meant to open the Council of Trent. It is the third and final testamentary deed and will of a testamentary trust, set up for the claiming of all “lost souls”, lost to the Sea (Holy See). 


The Venetians assisted in the creation of the first Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540, to use this papal bull as the basis of Ecclesiastical authority of Henry VIII. This Crown was secretly granted to England in the collection and “reaping” of lost souls. 


The Crown was lost in 1816, due to the deliberate bankruptcy of England, and granted to the Temple Bar which became known as the Crown Bar, or simply the Crown. The Bar Associations (British Accreditation Registry), and our courts have since been responsible for administering the “reaping” of the souls of the lost and damned, including the registration and collection of Baptismal certificates representing the souls collected by the Vatican and stored in its vaults. This is why judges wear black, for they mourn for the dead.

3rd Testamentary Deed & Will & 3rd Crown over Souls.

1540, Jesuit Order

The Catholic Churches Secret Weapon

The Jesuits are members of the Society of Jesus, founded in 1540 for a singular purpose:

“To neutralize the effects Protestantism was having on the rights, interests, and authority of the Roman Papacy. Their mission was, and remains, to infiltrate non-Catholic cultures and, by whatever means may be necessary, subjugate the people to Roman Catholicism. The term used by the Church to describe this process is ‘missionary adaptation’.”

The Jesuits Society’s mission around the World was to incite a Protestant population to separate itself from its Protestant monarchy and unwittingly make of itself a Catholic Nation, and be part of ‘The Holy Roman Empire’/ Babylonian World/System, and is what in fact it has become!

The Jesuits Society’s mission around the World was to incite a Protestant population to separate itself from its Protestant monarchy and unwittingly make of itself a Catholic Nation, and be part of ‘The Holy Roman Empire’/ Babylonian World/System, and is what in fact it has become!

The Roman Cult Empire uses every means possible to bring in total World control, from the Zionist Rothschild’s Banking families, to the Freemasons and Secret Societies, and Their own Military Order, the Jesuits. Jesuits: The society of Jesus, the largest male catholic religious order. Founded in 1540 by Ignatius of Loyola which was approved by Pope Paul III by bull

containing the ‘Formula of the Institute’. In it’s of the founding document it declared ‘whoever desires to serve as a soldier of God’. Jesuits are often referred to as ‘God's Soldiers’, ‘God's Marines’, or ‘The Company’.

Jesuits are led by a Superior General and are under the patronage of Madonna Della Strada – a title of Blessed Virgin Mary. It was disbanded by Pope Clement XIV in 1773 but then

restored by Pope Pius VII in 1814.

In 2013 the first Jesuit Pope was Jorge Mario Bergoglio who took the name Pope


The Catholic Churches Secret Weapon

1648 Peace of Westphalia

Peace of Westphalia

The Peace of Westphalia, concluded in 1648 in Münster (Germany), which ended the Thirty Years’ War, which started with an anti-Habsburg revolt in Bohemia in 1618 but became an entanglement of different conflicts concerning the constitution of the Holy Roman Empire, religion, and the state system of Europe. This contest was a civil “German war,” but foreign powers played a crucial role.

Scholars & historians have identified the modern, Western originated, international system of states, multinational corporations, and organisations that dominate the world system of today, as having begun at the Peace of Westphalia in 1648.

The ‘peace negotiations’ had no exact beginning and ending, because the participating total of 109 delegations never met in a plenary session, but dropped in between 1643 and 1646 and left between 1647 and 1649.

It was this event in history in which the (un)-Holy Roman Empire, created the concept of the Belligerent Sovereign State, which became legal entities, and are not the original countries.

They were made as legal entities that are corporations, and these Belligerent Sovereign states are what have evolved since then into Corporate Governments we have around the world today. 

Peace of Westphalia

1666, The Cestui Que Vie Trust Act


A Cestui Que Vie Trust is a fictional concept. It is a Temporary Testamentary Trust, first created during the reign of Henry VIII of England after breaking from Rome in 1534. He created a raft of his very own CQV trusts, which were later cemented in 1666 under Charles II in the enactment of the CQV Act of 1666. This was enacted behind closed Parliament doors using the distraction of the Great Fires of London happening at the time.

This act is where an Estate may be effected for the Benefit of a Person presumed lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions, by which such a Trust may be formed, were added in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents, mortgages, and private companies. The original purpose of a CQV Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs, or condition prevented the people from claiming their status as living, competent, and present, before a competent authority.  

The state (London) took custody of everybody and their property into a trust. The state became the trustee/husband holding all titles to the people and property, until a living man comes back to reclaim those titles, he can also claim damages.

When CAPITAL letters are used anywhere in a name this always refers to a legal entity/fiction, Company or Corporation no exceptions. e.g. John DOE or Doe: JANE


1689, English Bill of Rights

Australia does have a Bill of Rights

Australia does have a Bill of Rights

1744, Mayer Amschel Bauer

The Birth of the Rothschild Dynasty

On February 23rd, Mayer Amschel Bauer, an Ashkenazi Jew, is born in Frankfurt, Germany, the son of Moses Amschel Bauer, a money lender and the proprietor of a counting house.

Moses Amschel Bauer places a red sign above the entrance door to his counting house. This sign is a red hexagram (that geometrically and numerically translates into the number 666), which under Rothschild instruction will end up on the Israeli flag some two centuries later.

The Birth of the Rothschild Dynasty

1756 to 1788, Lex Mercatoria (Law Merchant)

Merchant Law infused into English Common Law

There is ancient commercial system, called in modern times, Law Merchant (latin: Lex Mercatoria) it’s jurisdiction is more like customs or a set of principles of operation in order for merchants to conduct themselves internationally. As things started to change and people started to get into boats and shipping and moving large cargo around the known world at the time, which would eventually be known as international fairs.

This system of doing things, evolved, it wasn’t fixed like regular laws, it worked with the times, based on principles based off fairness, and all the merchants agreed to this, because it actually worked. It was fast litigation! If there was a problem it was done within a day. Unlike Common Law where an outcome could take from 6 - 12mths at times.

This system did not require burdens of proof, that you had to have in the Common Law system. It was based on truth in an affidavit form or swearing to it. Then a group of other merchants would decide what was true, trying to get to the bottom of it in a timely fashion. The reasons for this was because ships would have to leave at high tide and if there was a problem that ship was most likely setting sail that day, within the next 4-6hrs. So when high tide came that ship was gone, it's unlikely there to be any remedy for the plaintiff, because the accused has fled and left with the ship and may never come back. It could also be the case that the ship has cargo that you claim is yours, and a lot of that cargo is perishables and you can’t argue for 8mths about a load of bananas because at the end of that, when you find out who owns the bananas they don’t exist anymore.

So the law system didn’t work for merchants, it wasn’t dynamic enough. So this system of Law Merchants evolved. In todays world it’s called Summary Judgement, so things are done on not proving something, its based on probabilities, the judge will tell you that.

Lex Mercatoria began to leak into the domestic courts of countries through ‘Pie Powder (Pie-Poudre) Courts’ that were at the Fairs, and they started out very transient and they started to get more solidified and they were called staple courts, and there were staple towns, mostly port towns, which was an actual building, and it became more present which wasn’t just associated with the fair. The king was ok with this at first, but then it started to take over and it became the situation where the King was not getting his cut.

So what Lord Mansfield did, who was the Chief Justice at the time, they fused it into the Common Law. So now the Merchants could go into the Common Law courts, but still operate in Lex Mercatoria. So the judges were told to take judicial notice of the Lex Mercatoria Law Merchant, when a commercial case came in. It was meant to go faster in the same way, with the same kind of principles. Over time they just stopped talking about it, but its still going on. Once you understand that, and you go and sit in a court for a while, you will start to see that this is what is going on in there, they are operating in Commerce. 

Merchant Law infused into English Common Law

1776, Adam Weishaupt & The Illuminati

The Beginnings of the Illuminati

Adam Weishaupt officially completes his organisation of the, “Illuminati,” on May 1st of this year. The purpose of the, “Illuminati,” is to divide the non-Jews through political, economic, social, and religious means. The plan is for the opposing sides of the goyim (non-Jews) to be armed whilst incidents are to be provided in order for them to fight amongst themselves; destroy national governments; destroy religious institutions; and eventually destroy each other.

Weishaupt soon infiltrates the Continental Order of Freemasons with this, “Illuminati,” doctrine and establishes lodges of the Grand Orient to be their secret headquarters. This is all under the orders and finance of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and the concept subsequently spreads into Masonic Lodges worldwide to the present day.

Weishaupt also recruits 2,000 paid followers including the most intelligent men in the field of arts and letters, education, science, finance, and industry. They are instructed to follow the following methods in order to control people:

-Use monetary and sex bribery to obtain control of men already in high places, in the various levels of all governments and other fields of endeavour. Once influential persons have fallen for the lies, deceits, and temptations of the Illuminati they are to be held in bondage by application of political and other forms of blackmail, threats of financial ruin, public exposure, and fiscal harm, even death to themselves and members of their families.

-The faculties of colleges and universities are to cultivate students possessing exceptional mental ability as well as belonging to well-bred families with international leanings, and recommend them for special training in internationalism, or rather the notion that only a one-world government can put an end to recurring wars and strife. Such training is to be provided by granting scholarships to those selected by the, “Illuminati.”

-All influential people trapped into coming under the control of the, “Illuminati,” plus the students who had been specially educated and trained, are to be used as agents and placed behind the scenes of all governments as experts and specialists. This is to ensure they advise the top executives to adopt policies which in the long-run serve the secret plans of the, “Illuminati,” one-world conspiracy and bring about the destruction of the governments and religions they are elected or appointed to serve.

-To obtain absolute-control of the press, at that time the only mass-communications media which distributed information to the public, so that all news and information could be slanted in order to make the masses believe that a one-world government is the only solution to the world’s many and varied problems.

The Beginnings of the Illuminati

1815, Battle of Waterloo

Battle of Waterloo & Nathan Mayer Rothschild

The five Rothschild brothers work to supply gold to both Wellington’s army (through Nathan in England), and Napoleon’s army (through Jacob in France), and begin their policy of funding both sides in wars. The Rothschilds’ love wars because they are massive generators of risk free debt.

Risk free, because the debts are guaranteed by the government of a country, and therefore the efforts of the population of that country, and furthermore it doesn’t matter which country loses the war because the loans are given on the guarantee that the victor will honour the debts of the vanquished.

Whilst the Rothschilds’ are funding both sides in this war, they use the banks they have spread out across Europe to give them the opportunity to set up an unrivalled postal service network of secret routes and fast couriers. Relevant post these couriers carry is opened up by these couriers and the details of their contents given to the Rothschilds’ so they are always one step ahead of current events.

These Rothschild couriers are the only merchants allowed to pass through the English and French blockades and they use this advantage to keep Nathan Mayer Rothschild up to date with how the war is going so he is able to use that intelligence to buy and sell from his position on the stock exchange in accordance with that intelligence.

One of Rothschild’s couriers, a man named Rothworth, upon learning the British won the Battle of Waterloo, takes off for the Channel and delivers this news to Nathan Mayer Rothschild, a full 24 hours before Wellington’s own courier.

Nathan Mayer Rothschild subsequently enters the stock exchange and instructs all his workers to start selling consuls (known as bonds today). Due to Rothschild’s reputation for being one step ahead with regard to information, the other traders panic, think the British have lost the war, and start selling frantically.

As a result the consuls plummet in value, at which point Nathan Mayer Rothschild discreetly instructs his workers to purchase all the consuls they can lay their hands on.

When the news comes through that the British had actually won the war, the consuls’ rocket up to a level even higher than before the war started, leaving Nathan Mayer Rothschild with a return of approximately twenty to one on his investment. In fact, Nathan Rothschild openly brags that in his seventeen years in England he has increased his initial £20,000 stake given to him by his father, 2500 times to £50,000,000.

The ownership of these bonds, or consuls, gives the Rothschild family complete control of the British economy, now the undisputed financial centre of the world (following Napolean’s defeat), and forces the British to set up a new Bank of England, under the control of Nathan Mayer Rothschild.

Back to 1815, this is the year Nathan Mayer Rothschild makes his famous statement,

“I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls Britain’s money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.”

The Rothschilds’ also use their control of the Bank of England to replace the method of shipping gold from country to country and instead use their five banks spread across Europe to set up a system of paper debits and credits, the banking system of today.

By the end of this century, a period of time that becomes known as the, “Age of the Rothschilds’,” it is estimated that the Rothschild family controls over half the wealth of the world.

 Battle of Waterloo & Nathan Mayer Rothschild

1828, Australian Courts Act

New South Wales & Van Diemans Land (TAS) adopt English Common & Statute Law

On 25 July 1828 the Australian Courts Act 1828 came into power. It enacted legislation of the British Parliament which ensured that the laws of England would be applied in the two existing Australian colonies, New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land. It also provided for trial by jury in the Supreme Court in civil cases and empowered the Governor to introduce general trial by jury in criminal matters.

The Act isn’t mentioned in many Australian history texts, as I discovered on searching the indexes of books in my personal library. Yet it represented a significant move away from autocratic rule in the colonies of New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land (Tasmania), a move that was instigated by its predecessor, the New South Wales Act of 1823.  

The 1828 Act clarified the relationship between the two colonies and the United Kingdom in terms of the administration of law, and strengthened the civil elements of the penal colony. Following the passage of the Act, all English common law and statute law, as it existed in England on the day of 25 July 1828, was held to be in force in New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land. This did not apply to previous English laws, however, and, most significantly, the 1828 Act made clear that it didn’t apply to future ones – unless the Acts passed by the UK Parliament specifically referred to the colonies.

As the Act sought to ‘provide for the Administration of Justice in New South Wales and Van Diemen's Land, and for the more effectual Government thereof, and for other Purposes relating thereto’, the Imperial authorities needed a concept to encompass both colonies together.

Prior to 1823, governors had been the source of executive and legislative power, and the final point of appeal. Under the 1828 Act, appeals to the governors of both colonies against Supreme Court decisions were ended. With the Governor’s Court abolished in 1824, the 1828 Act strengthened the other existing courts. The law courts and the judicial process became independent of the colonial governors.

Previously, governors could exercise power arbitrarily and courts were an extension of their powers. Resistance to this situation – the desire to place a limit on state power - finds echo in the struggles for the Magna Carta principle against arbitrary authority 800 years ago.

In the nineteenth century in England, people were fighting to expand suffrage, and so too in New South Wales the emancipists – the men and women who had once been convicts (and their supporters) – were taking the lead in seeking the development of civil society, trial by jury and, ultimately, representative government.

‘Trial by jury’ was another Magna Carta principle – expressed in 1215 as ‘judgement of peers’ – but it had taken centuries to achieve in England. Australians, luckily, were able to import it, though it took 45 years after the initial British settlement. The Australian Courts Act allowed for trial by jury in Supreme Court civil cases and empowered the governors to introduce trial by jury in criminal cases. It was finally introduced for people charged under criminal law in New South Wales in 1833 and Van Diemen’s Land in 1834.

The 1828 Act expanded the Legislative Councils – the ‘parliaments’ – of both colonies. Each was to have 10 to 15 members, appointed by the Crown, compared to the previous membership of five, when the first NSW Legislative Council was set up via the NSW Act of 1823.  

In recognizing that future laws could be legislated for locally, the 1828 Act set a firm foundation for the further development of a legal system, and greater democracy, in Australia; one that could respond better after 1828 to its own requirements and circumstances. The Act rightly assumed that New South Wales and Van Diemen’s Land would not forever be penal colonies.  However, the Act was a far cry from creating an independent or democratic status for the colonies. Future laws could be passed in the colonies only if these were not repugnant (inconsistent with or contradictory to) to the laws of the United Kingdom.

In NSW, this was further reinforced by the Imperial Acts Application Act 1969. However, this situation was changed completely in 1986, with the passage of the Australia Act that ended any ‘repugnancy’ test with regards to Australia’s states and territories.  

New South Wales & Van Diemans Land (TAS) adopt English Common & Statute Law

1837, Registration of Births, Deaths and Marriages

Registering of Births & Deaths begins

The CIVIL registration of births and deaths commenced 1st July 1837. From this date;

‘His Majesty was to provide a proper Office in London or Westminster, to be called “The General Register Office,” for keeping a Register of all Births (which the Catholic Church held records), as well as Deaths and Marriages of His Majesty’s Subjects in England.'

When a child is born in a hospital-WARD State (Estate), under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions specifically designed to deny, forever, the child any rights of Real Property, any Rights to be free, and any Rights to be known as a living breathing man or woman, but rather as a DEAD LEGAL FICTION or a creature or animal/chattel. 

The Birth Certificate is the Title to your soul and proof of ownership by the Holy See. The Claim of Right and the first Express Trust named Unam Sanctam, is the core of the Holy Sees ownership of your soul. 

Every Birth Certificate is a financial instrument lodged in the Vatican bank. The Vatican and it’s franchises hold all titles to all; our bodies, including copyright to our given names, our baptismal records, our souls, our property, our land deeds, mining claims, patents, trademarks, signatures, automobiles, and more, the list goes on. 

Registering of Births & Deaths begins

1863, Abraham Lincoln Declares Martial Law

Perpetual U.S. Martial Law

In 1863, Lincoln instituted martial law. He ordered that the states (people) either conscribe troops and provide money in support of the North or be recognized as an enemy of the nation. This martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today – what it means is that the President has dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by the government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America. This is the foundation of Presidential Executive Orders.

Perpetual U.S. Martial Law

1870, Lateran Treaty

Vatican City made into an Independent State

The Vatican having promoted and supported the career of Benito Mussolini was granted upon his election as Prime Minister a formal treaty known as the Lateran Treaty which:

(1) created the state of the Vatican City and guaranteed full and independent sovereignty to the Holy See;

(2) That the pope was pledged to perpetual neutrality in international relations and to abstention from mediation to a controversy except when specifically requested by all parties;

(3) a concordat establishing Catholicism as the religion of Italy;

(4) a financial arrangement awarding money to the Holy See in settlement of all its claims against Italy arising from the loss of temporal power in 1870; and

(5) to redefine the the canon sin of usury, to not mean gains from money lending, but rather simply profiting "exorbitantly", thereby enabling the spiritual and legal framework for establishing a bank completely controlled by the Catholic Church.

That in spite of Mussolini being known as both a mass murderer, facist and war criminal, the Vatican has continued to maintain the legitimacy of these treaties to the present day. That the agreement effectively made the Vatican a separate state in the middle of Italy and free to continue to operate under diplomatic immunity.

Upon the securing of diplomatic immunity of the Vatican, Pope Pius XI immediately authorized the establishment of the Istituto per le Opere di Religione (IOR) or Institute for Religious Works, also known as the Vatican Bank. That under the protection of the Lateran treaty of war criminal Mussolini, the Catholic Church did establish the first bank in history: that had full diplomatic immunity, that was completely controlled by a major religion and did not have to disclose its banking records, nor charter.

The purpose of the Vatican Bank upon its formation was to:

(1) To fund criminal enterprises including war, terrorism, drug trade expansion, assassination, and revolution;

(2) To invest in industries that promote social breakdown and dependence including arms trade, drug trade and media; &

(3) To launder the profits of various branches of the Catholic Church including the Mafia (established by the Vatican in 1870), the Nazis (established by the Vatican in 1921), the Jesuits and other criminal enterprises controlled by the Catholic Church including the Federal Reserve Bank System of the United States (1913).

Vatican City made into an Independent State

1873, The Columbia Organic Act of 1871 (United States Inc.)

The United States becomes a Corporation

The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter “Corp. U.S.”) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law. This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia.

In this Act, the Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment. The national constitution’s 13th, 14th and 15th amendments are respectively numbered 14th, 15th and 16th amendments in their constitution.

The United States becomes a Corporation

January 26th, 1910 Australia Day

Australia Day & the Hague Convention: War on Land

On the 26th January 1910, the day we call Australia Day is in actual fact the day we officially became a foreign occupied territory. Eight Hague War on land treaties were signed because of Australia’s involvement in Imperial Usufruct Agreements going back as far as the Geneva Conventions in 1864. The US became our foreign administrators of a de facto government who owed money to globalist bankers.

Australia Day & the Hague Convention: War on Land

1913, Federal Reserve System

Jekyll Island & the Creation of Fractional Reserve Banking

Following on from the event of the Columbia Organic Act of 1873, which essentially created UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC, this U.S. Corporation began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912, but they could not pay their debts so the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay. Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.’ assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.

As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government so they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money. The families said no (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they could not repay their debts in full). The families had foreseen this situation and had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name “Federal Reserve Bank”.

Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby they could transact their business via notes rather than with gold backed money. Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government.

Jekyll Island & the Creation of Fractional Reserve Banking

1917 - 1923, Bolshevik Revolution

Jewish Takeover of the Russian Tsar Monarchy

1917, Balfour Declaration

Rothschilds drag US into WWI & Claim for the Land of Palestine

1933, Bankruptcy

All nations involved in the First World War declared bankrupt

1948, Australia Joins the UN

Australia in bed with the UN & the passing of the Nationality & Citizenship Act

60,000 ANZACS died during WWI, and Billy Hughes, the Prime Minister of the day stood up for Australia allowing us to become an independent sovereign nation. His goal was to pay off this war debt and free Australia.

After another disastrous war (WWII) which incurred even more loss of life and further generational debt creation, Australia joined the United Nations and soon after there was a change in nationality status for all Australians to Citizens of Australia that were placed under the trusteeship of the United Nations, as per the Nationality and Citizenship Act 1948.

Australia in bed with the UN & the passing of the Nationality & Citizenship Act

1957, Queen Elizabeth II Christmas Speech

"I cannot give you laws or administer justice"

1960, Governor General Stolen

Governor General stolen to the Corporate Political Parties

In 1960 the last crown appointed Governor General Sir William Slim, retired and in his place the Queen sent over a letter of appointment for the next Governor General.

The problem was however, when Parliament got her letter, they put the Kangaroo and Emu seal over Her Royal Majesty’s Seal and stole the Governor General, turning him into an employee of the Political Parties and the corrupt belligerent state that we now call the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA (but in capital letters), essentially a corporation.

Now if you read our 1901 Gazetted Constitution, Section 7 and 24, it states in there specifically only we the people have the right to select our representatives, nowhere does it state Political Parties. Now if it’s not in the Constitution, it does not exist in law, no politician, no political party has the right to be in our Parliament, it’s as simple as that.

Governor General stolen to the Corporate Political Parties

1963, Assassination of John F Kennedy

Pope Paul IV sanctions death of John F Kennedy

President John F. Kennedy was publicly executed in a brutal and callous manner upon the direct orders of Pope Paul VI in order to prevent him from carrying out his plan to end the control of the Catholic over American policy through orders for the disbanding of the CIA as well as usurping the Catholic controlled Federal Reserve Bank by enacting Executive Order 11110 (4 June 1963) thereby injecting into the economy nearly five billion dollars (4.7) in interest-free cash and ending the extortion of the Federal Reserve.

That upon the brutal murder of President Kennedy, both sets of orders were rescinded the very next day. That President Kennedy remains the last President to actively attempt to regain the sovereign right of the United States to mint its own currency. He is also the only President to have ever attempted to disband the treacherous CIA since its inception in 1949.

That his murder was both a conspiracy of the highest branches of government, relating to the most fundamental rights of Americans to govern their own destiny free from traitors and external influences of corruption and as such also represents a coup d’état from which the American people have never yet regained control.

That in order to distract from the simple and unmistakable motives concerning the political assassination of President Kennedy, that both people personally involved in the conspiracy and the Catholic Church has promoted and encouraged the growth of a wide variety of spurious theories, including Russian plots, Mafia paybacks, and a range of other false theories. That these theories have assisted in distracting from the obvious and straight forward motives of the murder for over 40 years.

Pope Paul IV sanctions death of John F Kennedy

1964, UNCTAD

A Common Interest for a Common Fund

A book by Dr Helen B O'Neil called “A Common Interest in a Common Fund” was published in 1977.

This is a story about a United Nations Program for the transfer of control of all basic commodities out of nations like Australia to a division of the UN called United Nations Conference of Trade & Development (UNCTAD). Rewind back 13 years, in 1964 is when this organisation was established where 18 International Commodity boards would be set up to take control of all the World’s food stuff, fibres and minerals.

To Australia this meant basically our entire primary industry, such as:

·        Grain, Sugar & Meat

·        Wool, Cotton & Timber

·        Iron Ore, Coal &Copper etc. 

A Common Interest for a Common Fund

1966, Change in our Currency

Pounds to Dollars

6 years later in 1966, the politicians took us off the British Pound Sterling which is the currency as written in our Constitution, and put us on the decimal US Dollar. How did this happen?

Our corrupt Parliament filled with treasonous Politicians borrowed millions and millions of dollars from the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (also in capital letters and a Belligerent Corporatized state) and with their crony banks.

Now to secure these massive loans, we were told we had to do two things and that was:

1.      Transfer our monetary system over US dollars & cents

2.      Support the US by sending our young men to fight in the Vietnam war

Now these were the first 2 steps in a greater 4 step plan.

1972, Gough Whitlam & his Duumvirate Government

Corporatisation of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

The third step in this belligerent takeover of our Commonwealth, was the Dec 2nd 1972 election, when Prime Minister Gough Whitlam took control of the government before vote counting had finished and formed a duumvirate Government (that is a government of two people) which included Whitlam and Lance Barnard.


They took control over all the ministries and they started ripping our constitution and Parliament apart, by changing a multitude of things, such as:


·        Removing the Queen of United Kingdom & Ireland out of our Constitution, by amending the Royal Styles & Titles act and replacing it with a fictitious Queen on paper called the Queen of Australia.

·        They then registered two copies of our Constitution in the United States, making their own version of our Constitution, very similar to original gazetted 1901 Constitution, but the big kicker was removing the Preamble out


Note: The Preamble starts out as stating, “Whereas the People”, three very important words that establishes the fact that we the people of the Commonwealth of Australia as the supreme authority over the Parliament. So by taking the preamble out, they transferred the authority over to them over the People.

Corporatisation of the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

1974, New International Economic Order (NIEO)

The first of many different paths of the United Nations Agenda

The concept of the New International Economic Order (NIEO) was initially projected by Raul Prebisch and some other economists in the 1950’s and 1960’s, yet the first formal endorsement to it was received in April 1974, when the United Nations General Assembly at its sixth special session committed itself “to work urgently for the establishment of a new international economic order".

This system was to be based on equity, sovereign equality, common interest and co-operation among all States, irrespective of their economic and social systems. It set out to correct inequalities and redress existing injustices, make it possible to eliminate the widening gap between the developed and developing countries and ensure steadily accelerating economic and social development and peace and justice for present and future generations.

The NIEO contained a number of different UN programs including

IMF (International Monetary Fund) and the World Bank, both of which are Divisions of the United Nations would be merged, with all the powers that our Reserve Bank of Australia has such as controlling and lending, investment, setting interest rates, exchange rates, international funds transfer.

To facilitate this program, the main reserve currency that nations trade in at the current time which is the US dollar established at the Bretton Woods Conference towards the end of WWII would be gradually phased out and a new world monetary scheme would be introduced which would replace the US dollar as the money nations traded in.

There was a bit of discussion of what it would be called i.e. Special drawing rights, or Bank Corp which was a name dreamed up by the man who was involved in setting up the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1944, John Maynard Keynes (Keynesian Economic System) and he also had thought up this idea on World Commodity Control. 

Irrespective of what it was to be called, the first part of it all was the World Central bank issuing a new world money system which would replace national currencies creating a totally new ball game; and the second part would be the international control of all the nation’s food stuffs, fibres and minerals, supply management, pricing mechanisms etc.

This then spun off into a number of other programs, one program called the Law of the Sea (International Control of all Sea Beds) which was the international control and exploitation of the minerals on the sea bed and fisheries etc.

From 1974, after the NIEO initial introduction, it took 15 years (1989) for Australia to ratify the program.

The first of many different paths of the United Nations Agenda

1975, Lima Declaration

The Destruction of Australian Industries

The flow on effects from the formation of UNCTAD (United Nations Conference of Trade and Development), led to a world trade conference that took place in Lima, Peru in 1975. Famously known as the Lima Declaration, it calls for the redistribution of world industry so that developing countries would have 25% of it by the year 2000. 

To achieve this, radical changes in traditional concepts and practices are recommended. Economic growth in poorer countries could no longer be seen as the “trickle down” benefit of growth in rich countries.

To close the gap between rich and poor nations the developing countries would have to grow faster than the developed countries. With this end in mind, the Lima Declaration sets out the “main principles of industrialisation” and defines the “means by which the international community as a whole might take broad action to establish a New International Economic Order” (NIEO).

The Lima Declaration calls upon the developed countries to eliminate barriers to trade with developing countries and encourage their manufactured exports. They are asked to “restructure” their industries in order to deploy production capacity to developing countries and to expand technical assistance programmes.

Once our government started implementing the Lima Declaration they increased taxes and made it so difficult for businesses to manufacture in Australia that they were forced offshore.

All the big-name manufacturers fled overseas within a decade. Smaller manufacturers continued to flee as well, until today Australia has very little manufacturing capacity left at all.

The Destruction of Australian Industries

1978, Murder of Pope John Paul I

Superior General Pedro Arrupe orders death of Pope

That Jesuit Superior General Pedro Arrupe did arrange for the assassination of Pope John Paul I upon the revelation of the Pope intention to disband the Jesuit order and distribute their significant interests, including control of the Vatican Bank to other areas of the church. That Pope John Paul I intended to take this action in part because of the action of the Jesuits in both the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the Vietnam War, the global drug trade as well as Aldo Moro, a national Italian hero. That the murder of Pope John Paul I did prevent the disbanding of the Jesuits from taking place, but did result in a non-Jesuit friendly Pope being elected for the next 27 years, Pope John Paul II.

Superior General Pedro Arrupe orders death of Pope

1983, Code of Canon Law

Canon Law modernised

The 1983 Code of Canon Law (abbreviated 1983 CIC from its Latin title Codex Iuris Canonici), also called the Johanno-Pauline Code,[1] is the "fundamental body of ecclesiastical laws for the Latin Church".[2] It is the second and current comprehensive codification of canonical legislation for the Latin Church sui iuris of the Catholic Church. It was promulgated on 25 January 1983 by John Paul II and took legal effect on the First Sunday of Advent (27 November) 1983.[3] It replaced the 1917 Code of Canon Law which had been promulgated by Benedict XV on 27 May 1917.

Canon Law modernised

1986, Australia Act

Bob Hawke & the Australia Act

The 4th and final step in their belligerent takeover happened in 1986, when Prime Minister Bob Hawke enacted the Australia Act. It is the Australia Act, that our local governments say is where they get their Authority from, the State Government and what not. However, it was never signed into Law by the Queen.

Queen Elizabeth did visit Australia for this purpose, she put her stamp on the front page of the proposal of the Australia Act, but she did not agree to it. Her agreeance was only until it was put to the people of the Commonwealth of Australia via a referendum. Bob Hawke never held one and treasonously went ahead assuming the Queens stamp and signature on the front page as approval to go ahead signing into Law the Australia Act.

In 4 simple steps, during the period of 1960 to 1986, they have destroyed our Country and stepped all over our Constitution as if t was never there.

Bob Hawke & the Australia Act

1988, Local Council Referendum

Local Government is Unconstitutional

We are told that our Local Council’s authority is purportedly taken from the Local Laws Acts, Local Government Acts and the Australia Act 1986.

Under the Commonwealth Constitution, it is mentioned as a Department of State (page 935 Annotated version)

To date, there have been 3 referendums with which the people voted whether to recognise local government in the Constitution.

1) 1974 (the People said NO!)

2) 1988 (the People said NO! as second time)

3) 1999 (as part of the Republic agenda which included recognising local government in the constitution, the people AGAIN said NO! for a third time)

All local governments are illegitimate, they are members of an international body called ICLEI which is run by the United Nations, they are part of a sustainability program aka agenda for the 21st century.

The Act that the Local & State Governments rely on are unlawful

In the case of Attorney-General (WA) v Marquet [2003] HCA 67; 217 CLR 545; 202 ALR 233; 78ALJR 105 (13 November 2003), Justice Kirby states very clearly between paragraphs 203 – 213 that the purported 1986 Australia Act – which Government agencies hang their hats on every day – is illegal and void, because it purports to alter the Commonwealth Constitution without complying with Section 128, which can only happen by way of a referendum.

The Australia Act has been declared to be illegal and void, therefore any action that a government takes under this Act is illegal and void.

In the case of Port of Portland v State of Victoria [2010] HCA 44 ( 8 December 2010, all 7 Justices confirm the validity of the Imperial Acts Application Act 1980 and the Bill of Rights 1688.

Many lower courts routinely ignore or dismiss the Imperial Acts Application Act, so defendants can demand that magistrates are legally bound to rule in accordance to this Act if applicable.

In the case of Hospital Provident Fund Pty Ltd v Victoria [1953] HCA 8; (1953) 87 CLR 1 (11 March 1953), Justice Williams talks about Section 2 of the Victorian Acts Interpretation Act, that all Acts are subject to the Commonwealth Constitution and that a court should ensure the Constitutional validity of an Act.

All courts have to observe Constitutional validity when passing judgement, therefore defendants can produce this ruling if their matters are subject to this Act.

In the case of South Australia v Totani [2010] HCA 39 (11 November 2010, Chief Justice French stated that even magistrates' courts must be in accordance with Chapter III of the Commonwealth Constitution.

Again, this ruling proves that all courts are required to act in accordance to the Constitution, so if defendants become aware that a magistrate or judge is ignoring their Constitutional rights, they can produce this ruling and force the courts to adhere to it.

Local Government is Unconstitutional

1998, Pretend Wars for Belligerent Sovereign States

Total War vs. Declaration of War

In Their Illusionary System all ‘Sovereign States’ are at war, a fiction cannot declare war against the living/organic, so in Their dead fictional system, like Their Pretend Laws (Colour of Law) They must have pretend wars, so as to keep the fictive World System under perpetual pretend Military/Martial law, e.g. The Cold War, War on Drugs and the current War on Terror… etc.

“On 13 May 1998, at the outbreak of the Eritrean–Ethiopian War, Ethiopia, in what Eritrean radio described as a "total war" policy, mobilized its forces for a full assault against Eritrea. The Claims Commission found that this was in essence an affirmation of the existence of a state of war between belligerents (belligerent Sovereign States), not a declaration of war, and that Ethiopia also notified the United Nations Security Council, as required under

Article 51 of the UN Charter…”

This war above was not a declaration of war because it was between two belligerent Sovereign States that are already in a state of war (Note: it was described as "total war"), all members of the UN are Belligerent Sovereign States, and not the organic country that can and must make a declaration of war, to be lawful.

Article 51 UN Charter states:

“Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self

defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security

Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.”

Note: It’s a legal war within Their System and according to Their rules, but is not

lawfully declared.

Keep in mind, that under the ‘Law of Nations’ only sovereigns (organic) can declare war and treaty with other sovereigns (organic), how They are doing it is as the CEO/President of a Corporate ‘Belligerent Sovereign State’ a Legal Personality (legal fiction), CEO’s of a Corporation that don’t have any authority to do anything outside their Corporation or Their Corporate System, in Their fraudulent System.

Total War vs. Declaration of War
Created by CLAWS